Hunt Foods, Inc. v. O'Disho
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, District Judge.
This is an action for specific performance, a remedy to which the plaintiff claims it is entitled upon principles of equity and pursuant to the provisions of Section 1788 of the Civil Code of California.
The nature of the proceeding suggests a brief recitation of the facts which gave rise to the action.
It appears that in October of 1948, the defendant O’Disho interested himself in the purchase of a twenty (20) acre peach orchard in Stanislaus County, California.
His lack of funds precluded purchase through ordinary commercial channels, with the result that one Flebut, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bomberger v. McKelveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Equitable Gas Light Co. v. Baltimore Coal Tar & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
- Eastern Rolling Mill Co. v. MichlovitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
- Pittenger Equipment Co. v. Timber Structures, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Morgan v. PatilloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaiser Trading Co. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Campbell Soup Co. v. DiehmDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. The Pittston CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. The Pittston CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958