Legal Opinion
S & M BRANDS, INC. v. Summers
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 16, 2006No. 3:05CV0171PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
WISEMAN, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Paul G. Summers’ Motion For Reconsideration (Doc. No. 131), filed in conjunction with a supporting Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 132) and numerous exhibits and affidavits. The sole subject of the present motion is the Court’s determination on summary judgment that Plaintiff International Tobacco Partners, Ltd. (“ITP”) has standing to bring the only claim in this case that has not already been dismissed for failure to state a claim or on summary judgment. Defendant argues that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kardules v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Can Do, Inc. Pension & Profit Sharing Plan & Successor Plans v. Manier, Herod, Hollabaugh & SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- S & M BRANDS, INC. v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Church Joint Venture, L.P. v. Blasingame (In re Blasingame)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- S&M Brands, Inc. v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- In re BlasingameBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Nirenberg v. Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Roeder & Lazar, PCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.