Legal Opinion
Nirenberg v. Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Roeder & Lazar, PC
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 25, 2025No. 2:24-cv-10619Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION HENRY NIRENBERG, Plaintiff, Case No. 24-cv-10619 v. Honorable Robert J. White COUZENS, LANSKY, FEALK, ROEDER & LAZAR, P.C., et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT This case was removed from state court and arises from allegedly improper distributions from two trust accounts. (ECF Nos. 1, 1-2). Plaintiff Henry Nirenberg, a state court-appointed special fiduciary, asserts claims for (1) legal malpractice against Defendants Jack S. Couzens and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Hensley Manufacturing, Inc. v. Propride, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Allen W. Rose v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Riverview Health Institute LLC v. Medical Mutual of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.