Legal Opinion
Kardules v. City of Columbus
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 20, 1996No. 94-3704PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSEN, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which KEITH, J., joined. BATCHELDER, J. (pp. 1356-59), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the result only.
ROSEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Emery Bennett and David Mango appeal decisions of the District Court granting a motion by Defendants-Ap-*1339peUees City of Columbus, James P. Joyce and George J. Arnold for summary judgment, and denying Appellants’ motion for summary judgment. Appellants are two Ohio citizens who claim that their right to vote on a ballot issue concerning the proposed merger of two suburban Columbus…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- National Rifle Ass'n of America v. MagawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Coalition for Government Procurement v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Parsons v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Zurich Insurance Company v. Logitrans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.