Legal Opinion

Steele v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1969No. 39821PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

In a well-considered memorandum opinion, the trial judge wrote:

Neither by treating the matter as a motion for summary judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12 (c), nor as a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, could the plaintiff by any theory prevail. Plaintiff did not state a cause of action and the matters alleged are not ones subject to judicial relief.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his action with prejudice. His assignments of error present one issue: does his complaint, supplemented by the record available for consideration on motion for summary judgment or for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maki v. Aluminum Building ProductsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State ex rel. Cann v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State ex rel. Wells v. DykemanWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barr v. Interbay Citizens Bank of TampaWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kammerer v. Western Gear Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Snedigar v. HoddersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. Stanard v. BolinWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Edna Christensen v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API