Steele v. Johnson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
In a well-considered memorandum opinion, the trial judge wrote:
Neither by treating the matter as a motion for summary judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12 (c), nor as a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, could the plaintiff by any theory prevail. Plaintiff did not state a cause of action and the matters alleged are not ones subject to judicial relief.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his action with prejudice. His assignments of error present one issue: does his complaint, supplemented by the record available for consideration on motion for summary judgment or for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maki v. Aluminum Building ProductsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. Cann v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- State ex rel. Wells v. DykemanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by16 opinions
- Barr v. Interbay Citizens Bank of TampaWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Kammerer v. Western Gear Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- Snedigar v. HoddersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Stanard v. BolinWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Edna Christensen v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.