Stanard v. Bolin
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
This appeal presents the question of whether the common-law action for breach of promise to marry should be abolished. The trial court concluded that the action was contrary to public policy and dismissed the plaintiff's (appellant's) complaint with prejudice under CR 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We accepted review and conclude that the action is not contrary to public policy.
Because plaintiff's complaint was dismissed under CR 12(b)(6), the factual contentions of her complaint must be accepted as true for purposes of review. Barnum v. State, 72…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Kramer v. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- Hogenson v. Service Armament Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Wyman v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Corrigal v. Ball & Dodd Funeral Home, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Bingaman v. Grays Harbor Community HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- St. Luke Evangelical Lutheran Church, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Senear v. Daily Journal-AmericanWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Gilbert v. BarkesKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.