Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Bayarsky v. Brooks
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1946No. 8933PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The suit at bar is a qui tam action brought under the False Claims Act, R.S. § 3491, 31 U.S.C.A. § 232. It was filed on January 5, 1942 by the relator, David Bayarsky, on his own behalf and on behalf of the United States. The complaint alleges that the defendants in 1935 and 1936 conspired to defraud the United States by submitting collusive bids, by preventing others from bidding or performing their contracts for the sale of sand and stone to the United States for use on WPA projects in New Jersey, and that the defendants presented claims against the United States…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Weekly Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. PittmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Sherr v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States Ex Rel. Sherr v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States ex rel. Wisconsin v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States ex rel. Merena v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States ex rel. Bayarsky v. BrooksDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
- United States Ex Rel. Bayarsky v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.