Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Bayarsky v. Brooks

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 1, 1954No. 11046_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

Bayarsky instituted the instant qui tam action on January 5, 1942, under the False Claims Act, enacted March 2, 1863, R.S. § 3491. The Act was amended on December 23, 1943, 57 Stat. 608. See 31 U.S.C.A. § 232. The case has been before us once before on appeal and the facts set out in our earlier opinion need not be repeated here. We reversed an order of the court below abating the suit, concluding that despite the fact that the complaint filed by Bay-arsky, mutatis mutandis, was a Chinese copy of an indictment filed by the United States, and contained no information not in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Weekly Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Sherr v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. United States ex rel. Bayarsky v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  4. United States ex rel. Bayarsky v. BrooksDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
  5. United States ex rel. Bayarsky v. BrooksDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Merena v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Marshall P. Safir v. Robert J. Blackwell, Assistant Secretary of Commerce, Marshall P. Safir v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Robert J. Merena v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation United States of America, United States of America Ex Rel. Kevin J. Spear the Berkeley Community Law Center Jack Dowden v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc. United States of America, United States of America Ex Rel. Glenn Grossenbacher Charles W. Robinson, Jr. v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. USA Ex Rel Merena v. Smithkline BeechamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API