Legal Opinion

United States v. Pittman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1945No. 11395PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

A qui tam suit under R.S. § 3491, 31 U.S.C.A. § 232, was brought on August 5, 1943, by Charles M. Hewitt as relator in the name of the United States against the appellees. After R.S. § 3491 was amended by the Act of Dec. 23, 1943, 57 Stats. 608, and under the provisions of the amendment, the United States appeared in the suit and asserted a purpose to carry it on. The defendants-appellees moved to dismiss the suit (1) because the plaintiff Hewitt had not given notice to the Attorney General of the pendency of the suit as required by the Act, and (2) because the plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. Baker-Lockwood Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Williams v. NEC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. United States ex rel. Wisconsin v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Federal Recovery Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Cory v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  5. United States Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Palumbo Bros.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API