Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Sherr v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 3, 1944PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
The relator, Moses B. Sherr, brought this qui tam action on December 23, 1942, against the Anaconda Wire and Cable Company and some of its officers. Only the corporation was served. The action was started two days after an indictment had been filed by a Grand Jury sitting in the United States District Court at Fort Wayne, Indiana. That Grand Jury heard evidence during the month of December 1942, concerning alleged fraudulent practices of the defendant corporation, Anaconda Wire and Cable Company, and certain of its Marion plant officials in circumventing and falsifying…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Louisiana Ex Rel. Folsom v. Mayor and Administrators of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Norris v. CrockerSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- State Ex Rel. Washington County v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Davis v. Long's Drugs, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1976
- Sherr v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Hay v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
- United States ex rel. Bayarsky v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- United States ex rel. Bayarsky v. BrooksDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.