Miller v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Motion to strike out certain words in a defense as irrelevant and redundant.
1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.
Motion to strike out certain words in the second defense of the admitted .answer, on the ground that the same is irrelevant and redundant, under section 545 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The facts alleged in the complaint are denied by the answer and. in addition thereto defendant sets up a separate defense “that the defendant duly performed all the conditions and covenants in said agreement contained (the agreement described in the complaint) on its part to be performed.” This defense, so set forth, should be stricken out. Rogers v. Morton, 46 Misc. Rep. 494; Stieffel v. Tolhurst, 55 App.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stieffel v. TolhurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- South Dakota v. McChesneyNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Blaut v. BlautNew York Supreme Court · 1903
- Rogers v. MortonNew York Supreme Court · 1905