Rogers v. Morton
New York Supreme Court
Actions on promissory notes. Demurrers to defenses and counterclaim.
1Opinion of the CourtClarke, J.
Two actions are brought on promissory notes by an indorsee, one against the maker and payee and the other against the maker. The complaints set forth the notes and contain the usual averments. The answers are alike and each contains a general denial and three separate defenses and a counterclaim. The plaintiff demurs to each defense on the ground that the same is insufficient in law upon the face thereof, and also to the counterclaim, as hereinafter stated. The facts admitted by the demurrer to- the second defense (the first separate defense) are: Defendants were heavily interested in a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Douglass v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co. v. KneelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. CuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Walker v. American Central InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Western Transportation & Coal Co. of Michigan v. KilderhouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Woodhouse, Drake & Carey, Ltd. v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Miller v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1910