Legal Opinion
Cary L. Hoover v. Wyandotte Chemicals Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 25, 1972No. 71-3017PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
In the spring of 1964 defendant, Wyandotte Chemicals Corporation, was finalizing plans to initiate production at its G-2 chlorine plant in Geismar, Louisiana. Because of possible mercury contamination the company decided to require various employees in the G-2 chlorine plant to change into work clothes before commencing work and to change clothes and shower at the end of their shift. In April of 1964, company representatives met with officials of the Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers International Union, which has at all relevant times represented all production and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Nardone v. General Motors, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1962
- Williams v. W. R. Grace & Co. Davidson Chemical DivisionDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1965
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lessie Anderson v. Cagle's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Anderson v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2001
- Bejil v. Ethicon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Cargill Meat Solutions Wage & Hour LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- William Turner v. City Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.