Legal Opinion

Peak v. Key System Transit Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1928No. Docket No. 6045PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs pursuant to the verdict of a jury in an action brought to recover damages on account of personal injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of defendant, its agents and servants.

Plaintiff Peak was injured on September 5, 1924. At the time of his injury he was employed by one Fred W. Diehl, and the nature of his employment was as driver of a truck. The said Diehl at all times embraced within our inquiry carried compensation and accident insurance with the State Compensation Fund.

In November of 1924…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Mann v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Robinson v. Western States Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bach v. C. Swanston & SonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Hamm v. San Joaquin & Kings River Canal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Robbins v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. O'Brien v. EdensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API