Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1929No. Docket No. 6265PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

This being an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit it is unnecessary to review the evidence except in so far as it tends to establish facts favorable to appellant’s contention that the death of her husband was caused by respondents’ negligence. With this thought in mind and ignoring all contradictory evidence we may thus state the situation as it was presented to the court below on respondents’ motion for a nonsuit:

The accident which resulted in the unfortunate death of Joseph M. Robbins occurred at 6:05 P. M. of February 24, 1926, at Prestolite Crossing, a public…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. StegemeierIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Holmes v. South Pacific Coast RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Wilkinson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Eastman v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Gallo v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Cooper v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API