Legal Opinion

Melendres v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1975No. Civ. 42870PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

Statement of Facts

Adolph B. Melendres (Melendres), 1 respondent, was a police investigator employed by the Police Department of the City of Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Fire & Police Protective League (League), appellant, in 1971 had a membership of approximately 9,000 regular firemen and sworn policemen who were employed by the City of Los Angeles. 2 The total employment by the city of regular firemen and sworn policemen in that year was approximately 10,000.

In June of 1971, as a result of certain action taken by the Los Angeles City Council, the firemen and policemen of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Winslow v. Harold G. Ferguson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Kennedy v. WollenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. In Re OsofskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Laffitte v. Robert Half International Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Lealao v. Beneficial California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Bank of America v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Ridgeway v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  5. Laffitte v. Robert Half International Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API