Legal Opinion
Phillips-Michigan Co. v. Field Body Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1922No. Docket No. 83PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
On motion the bill to foreclose a mechanic’s lien was dismissed. Plaintiff has appealed. The bill alleges that under a written contract between the parties plaintiff equipped a certain factory building of defendant with a system of automatic fire sprinklers.
We quote from the contract:
“That the said system is not, and shall not, become a fixture, but shall be, and remain personal property, and the title and right of possession thereto, shall remain in the said Phillips-Michigan Company until fully paid for. Said second party expressly agrees that it acquires no title to such system until it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Young v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Atkinson v. JapinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Case Manuf'g Co. v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1889
- Perkins v. Golden GirlMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Dawson v. Chippewa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by8 opinions
- Floyd v. RamboSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Peter Schuttler Co. v. GuntherMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Contractors Equipment Co. v. ReasnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Thomas Spacing Machine Co. v. Security Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- In re Harmony Theatre Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.