Legal Opinion
State v. Burss
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 8, 1993No. CC 89CR-0433-TM; CA A67651; SC S39656PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
In this criminal case, defendant moved for dismissal of the charges against him on the ground that the state had failed to bring him to trial within the 180-day period prescribed by the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) (codified at ORS 135.775). 1 The trial court denied the motion, and defendant was convicted. The Court of Appeals reversed. State v. Burss, 113 Or App 494, 833 P2d 1300 (1992). We allowed review and now reinstate the judgment of the circuit court.
On June 6, 1989, a Deschutes County Grand Jury indicted defendant on two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Thomas v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. BurssCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CliftonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- State v. SomerlotWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. SillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.