Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Keeney
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1989No. TC 86-C-11016; CA A41449; SC S35845PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.
In this habeas corpus proceeding under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), 1 we must decide whether summary judgment was appropriate on petitioner’s contention that he is not a “fugitive” from the State of Washington.
Petitioner is an inmate at the Oregon State Penitentiary. He is charged in Clark County, Washington, with Premeditated Murder in the First Degree and Felony Murder in the First Degree (RCW 9A.32.030(l)(a) and 9A.32.030(l)(c), respectively). The Clark County prosecuting attorney has filed a “Request for Temporary Custody,” proposing to bring petitioner to trial in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Matter of StraussSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- State v. GottfreedsonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. McCaskeyWashington Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BurssOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Naisbitt v. RaichlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. ChampNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001