Legal Opinion
Stiebitz v. Mahoney
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 2, 1957PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivau, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Doris Stiebitz and Marie V. Kabrick, instituted this action against John C. Mahoney and Herman 0. Sehendel. The complaint is in two counts. Under the first, the plaintiffs seek recovery from the defendant Mahoney for injury to their persons and property arising out of an alleged battery, indecent assault, attempted rape and armed robbery committed upon them by Mahoney while he was on duty as a police officer. With this count we have no concern.
The second count, directed solely against the defendant Sehendel, contains the following allegations: On June 26,1955, Mahoney was, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leger v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Board of Water Commissioners v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Wadsworth v. Town of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Wolf v. SulikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Tremp v. PattenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
3Cited by50 opinions
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Evon v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority v. A.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.