Legal Opinion

Witte v. Fullerton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1962No. 39584PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Chief Justice.

Mrs. Jewell Fullerton, defendant in error, filed an action against Fred Witte, plaintiff in error, to recover for personal injuries allegedly received in a motor vehicle collision. Plaintiff in error appeals from order overruling his motion for a new trial following judgment against him based upon jury verdict. The parties are referred to hereinafter as they appeared in the trial court.

Two weeks before trial defendant filed “Motion for Physical Examination” in which he requested the trial court “to require the plaintiff to submit to a physical examination by a doctor…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. C. R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. Wanek v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Pratt v. WomackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. City of Kingfisher v. AltizerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. Goodwin v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hobbs v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Wasmund v. NunamakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Boswell v. SchultzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Avery v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API