Wasmund v. Nunamaker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
This is an application to have a writ of prohibition issued out of this court made absolute.
The issue set forth in the petition for the writ is a narrow one. Respondent plaintiffs, LeRoy Wasmund and Mrs. Geneva Wasmund, have brought an action against defendant relators, Earl Nunamaker and Jeanne Nunamaker, alleging that Mrs. Wasmund sustained permanent brain damage and damage to the nervous system in an automobile col lision out of which the action arose. Pretrial procedures reveal that in connection therewith Mrs. Wasmund has been examined by doctors engaged in the specialty…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Jeppesen v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Parker v. O'PHELANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Petition of GiblinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Hancock-Nelson Mercantile Co. v. WeismanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.