Legal Opinion

Avery v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 22, 1969No. 43305PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice:

In this original proceeding for a writ of prohibition and/or mandamus against the respondent trial judge we are asked to hold that where one files a damage suit in which he seeks to recover for certain personal injuries that he thus voluntarily injects his physical condition in the case as an issue and thereby waives the privilege against disclosure of the physician-patient communications protected by 12 O.S. 1961, § 385(6).

The statute involved provides in part:

“The following persons shall be incompetent to testify:
“6. A physician or surgeon concerning any communication made…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roeser v. PeaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Phipps v. SasserWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hudson v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. Westerheide v. ShillingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Bond v. Independent Order of ForestersWashington Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Company v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  2. Herbert v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Ellis v. GurichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Marcus v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  5. Avery v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API