Legal Opinion
United States v. Rhine
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 29, 2009No. 08-10502PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIENER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Curtis Oneal Rhine was convicted, based on his plea of guilty without a plea agreement, on one count of possession with intent to distribute 1.89 grams of cocaine base and one count of felon in possession of a firearm. Rhine now appeals his sentence, contending that the district court clearly erred when it determined that his earlier drug-related activity was relevant conduct for sentencing purposes. Convinced that Rhine’s earlier conduct cannot properly be considered relevant conduct for his sentencing on the offense of conviction, we reverse and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. AlonzoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Alvin SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Vladimir Cedano-RojasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Lee Roy Mullins, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Nicholas HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. DamatoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Ricardo HinojosaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Curtis RhineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.