Legal Opinion
United States v. Alonzo
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 9, 2006No. 05-20130PublishedCited by 401 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
The defendant-appellant Aurelio Alonzo, Jr. (“Alonzo”) appeals his post-Booker 1 Guidelines sentence, arguing that the district court’s use of his relevant conduct to calculate his base offense level violates the Sixth Amendment. Alonzo also argues that his Guidelines sentence is unreasonable because it was calculated based solely upon his relevant conduct without respect to the conduct underlying his offense of conviction. Finding no error, we affirm.
Alonzo was charged in three counts of a thirteen-count superceding indictment that alleged a large drug-trafficking…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. John Kevin TalleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Robert MykytiukCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by401 opinions
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Mondragon-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
396 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.