Legal Opinion
Beasley v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 22, 1998No. AC 17295; AC 17296PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, C. J.
The petitioners, Marvin Beasley and John W. Narducci, Jr., separately petitioned for writs of habeas corpus challenging the respondent commissioner of correction’s Administrative Directive 9.4, paragraph five (July 6, 1994 amendment), which operates to restrict statutory good time eligibility for inmates classified in administrative segregation. The habeas court consolidated the petitions for trial and subsequently dismissed them. The petitioners’ separate appeals from the dismissals were consolidated by this court because they raise identical appellate claims.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ralph Abed v. John J. Armstrong, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Massey v. Secretary, Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- State v. ParraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Green v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Beasley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.