Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. Deaton
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINIoN OF THE COURT BY
JUDGE RATLIFF
-ReVerSing.
In March, 1932, for ■ a paid premium, appellant sold, executed, and delivered to appellee a certain life and accident insurance policy. The policy or any copy thereof does not appear in the record, but it is manifest from the pleadings, evidence, and brief of counsel that the liabilities of appellant under the terms of the policy were very restricted in their scope and it insures only against accidents sustained by the insured by coming contact with a vehicle being propelled by steam, cable, electricity, naphtha, gasoline, horse, compressed air,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. LinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Hurst Home Insurance v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BreslinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Mattingly v. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Glenn v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- Hazelwood v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938