Cavanagh v. Pinkerton's National Detective Agency, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
Relying upon § 9(d) of the Universal Military Training and Service Act of 1951, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 459(d), plaintiff, a former serviceman, brings this suit claiming compensation and “such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.”
Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency, Inc., a Delaware corporation, having a place of business in Boston, is a widely known agency for supplying guards, investigators, and various' types of protective service. In its Boston office it em*51ploys a manager, assistant managers, a chief clerk, a supervisor of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Trusteed Funds, Inc. v. DaceyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
- Keserich v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Kemp v. John Chatillon & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas Henry Carter v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Fortenberry v. OWEN BROTHERS PACKING COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1966
- United States ex rel. Sliva v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Thomas Henry Carter v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968