Legal Opinion
Pugach v. Dollinger
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 14, 1960No. Nos. 306, 307, Dockets 26116, 26147PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Chief Judge.
The question for decision is whether a federal court should enjoin state officers from divulging wiretap evidence in a state criminal trial, when introduction of this evidence will constitute the violation of a federal criminal statute. In the two cases before us Judges Bryan and Rayfiel both refused to grant injunctive relief, and we affirm their judgments.
In No. 306, Pugach v. Dollinger, appellant and several others were indicted in November 1959 by the State of New York for burglary in the second degree, maiming, assault in the second degree and conspiracy. Their case…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Stefanelli v. MinardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Watson v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Lee v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ivy Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company and New York Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellees-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Studebaker Corporation v. Richard D. GittlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Pugach v. KleinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Orth-O-Vision, Inc. v. Home Box OfficeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.