Legal Opinion

Pugach v. Klein

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 11, 1961PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacMAHON, District Judge.

These applications by Pugaeh for habeas corpus, mandamus, and warrants, for arrest and search raise once again the vexing question of whether a federal court ought to interfere at the preliminary stage of a state criminal prosecution allegedly resulting from wire tap-evidence obtained in violation of the Federal Communications Act, 47 U.S.C.A. §§ 501, 605, but in compliance with the clashing law of the State of New York. N.Y.Const. art. I, § 12; N.Y.Penal Law § 738 (McKinney 1960); N.Y.Code of Criminal Procedure § 813-a (McKinney 1960).

In pertinent part, Section 605…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. Quinn v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  4. Lee v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Alex Carl Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API