Legal Opinion

State v. Brust

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1999No. 951318; CA A95014PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count each of possession of a controlled substance and unlawful possession of a firearm. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal on the firearms charge. He argues that the state failed to prove the necessary element of his failure to have a license to carry the firearm. We agree with defendant, reverse the firearms conviction, and remand for resentencing.

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense. In the course of the stop, defendant admitted that he had methamphetamine in the car. Police officers…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. Vasquez-RubioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. WillyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. SepelakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. State v. SepelakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API