Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 15, 2006No. 00CR0281; A118198PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance. She assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion for a judgment of acquittal, arguing that the state failed to present any evidence to establish venue. Venue is a material allegation that must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Werdell, 202 Or App 413, 420 n 4, 122 P3d 86 (2005). Because we agree with defendant, we reverse.

In reviewing the denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal, “this court resolves any conflicts in the evidence in favor of the state and gives the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. RoperOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. WerdellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. BrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. MathieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API