Legal Opinion
PCI/RCI v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 14, 1997No. 96-575CPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on plaintiffs application for attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1994). The court must decide whether defendant’s position in this dispute was substantially justified.
*787PACTS
The facts relevant to this pre-award bid protest, in which plaintiff sought injunctive relief restraining the Government from awarding a contract for a building project to any bidder other than plaintiff, are set forth in PCI/RCI, A Joint Venture v. United States, 36 Fed. Cl. 761 (1996), and are discussed…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Federal Election Commission v. Congressman Charles G. RoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Preseault V. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- California Marine Cleaning, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Hopi Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- KMS Fusion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.