Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Hentges

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 7, 1925No. 15327PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

FOSTER, C.

This appeal is prosjeeuierl by Harry Barnett, Robert Huston and John Huston, a copartnership, doing business under the firm style and name of Barnett & Huston, plaintiffs in error, defendants below, to reverse a judgment of the district court of Noble county rendered on October 27, 1923, whereby the defendant in error, as plaintiff, in said court recovered a judgment against the plaintiffs in error in the sum of $827.50. Parties ■'will be hereinafter referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

A jury was waived and the cause tried to the court, which rendered a general…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kibby v. BinionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Scroggins v. New State Town-Site Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hinton v. SaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Dobbins v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Mortgage Bond Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Russell v. Lennox Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Smart v. BillingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API