Legal Opinion
Continental Bank v. Blethen
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1970No. Civ. 34685PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FILES, P. J.
The parties to this appeal are the successive assignees of the accounts receivable of a hotel. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that defendant Blethen, the assignee first in time, had collected $8,491.53 on accounts which had been lawfully assigned to plaintiff Contiental Bank, who had obtained priority by filing the notice prescribed in former Civil Code section 3018. The court therefore gave judgment in favor of the bank against Blethen in the amount of $8,491.53 plus prejudgment interest in the amount of $3,607.86. Blethen is appealing from this judgment.
Tho…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Conderback, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Chase v. National Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- H. S. Mann Corp. v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leff v. GunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Esgro Central, Inc. v. General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- G. R. Bott v. American Hydrocarbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Credit Managers' Ass'n v. BrubakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,536 A. B. Parvin, and Cross-Appellant v. Davis Oil Company, Jack Davis, Marvin Davis, and Paul Messinger, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.