Legal Opinion

Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,536 A. B. Parvin, and Cross-Appellant v. Davis Oil Company, Jack Davis, Marvin Davis, and Paul Messinger, and Cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1980No. 77-1663, 77-1664PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

Parvin sued Davis Oil Company (“DOC”) for damages arising from three investment contracts that Parvin contended violated both California and federal securities laws. The district court initially dismissed the action finding that (1) the oil and gas lease interests were not securities under either California or federal law, (2) the transactions did not involve sufficient contacts with California to permit application of California law, and (3) the transactions were private offerings exempted from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. We reversed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Pago Pago Aircrash of January 30, 1974District Court, C.D. California · 1981
  2. Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
  3. Meyer v. Dixon Bros., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cert. of Question From US Dist. CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API