Michaud v. MacGregor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The respondents in March, 1893, entered into a contract with the appellant, which was executed on his behalf by his son and agent, Lane MacGregor, whereby they agreed to build for him a store building, according to certain plans and specifications, upon his lots in the city of Duluth, for the sum of $32,323.90. They commenced the work of erection April 1, and completed the building September 5, 1893, and the contract price was paid in full; but the respondents claimed payment for extra work, which being-refused, they brought this action. They claimed to recover the sum of $983 for the removal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lamberton v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Bryant v. LivermoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Spencer v. SheehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Wisconsin River Log Driving Ass'n v. D. F. Comstock Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by16 opinions
- Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Linz v. SchuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- King v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Lehman v. StoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Angel v. MurraySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.