Marvin v. Foster
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county by William F. Marvin against Clarence H. Foster and Mary P. Foster, Ms wife,, and Edward H. Foster and Sarab C. Foster, Ms wife, for partition. The case was tried before Lewis, J., without a jury, who ordered judgment in favor of defendants. The facts are stated in the opinion. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
This action was brought for a partition of certain lots and parcels of land situate in the city of Duluth, or, if a partition could not be made without material injury to the rights and interests of the parties, then that a sale thereof be made.
*155In order to dispose properly of the questions raised in this case, we will refer to the facts as briefly as possible': In the year 1842 Thomas Foster and Hannah C.. Foster, referred to in the pleadings, intermarried, and lived together as husband and wife until some time in the year 1873, and between the years 1851 and 1873 they were residents of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Arthur v. IsraelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Estate of RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. FredrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Chapman v. ChapmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Bruguiere v. BruguiereCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Hooker v. HookerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.