Legal Opinion

Estate of Richardson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1890No. 32PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL BY MATILDA RICHARDSON FROM THE ORPHANS’ COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. No. 32 July Term 1889, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 34 October Term 1888, O. C. On January 11, 1889, the account of Louisa S. Richardson, widow and administratrix of William T. Richardson, deceased, was called for audit before Ashman, J. Mrs. Matilda Richardson appeared by counsel claiming as widow of the decedent.

Read the full summary

APPEAL BY MATILDA RICHARDSON FROM THE ORPHANS’ COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. No. 32 July Term 1889, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 34 October Term 1888, O. C. On January 11, 1889, the account of Louisa S. Richardson, widow and administratrix of William T. Richardson, deceased, was called for audit before Ashman, J. Mrs. Matilda Richardson appeared by counsel claiming as widow of the decedent. The essential facts, as found by the auditing judge, were as follows: William T. Richardson was married to Matilda Little on November 22, 1849, and had two children by her. On April 13, Í1857, they…

1Per curiam

This case is affirmed upon the opinion of the learned judge of the Orphans’ Court upon the exceptions.

Decree affirmed and the appeal dismissed-at the costs of the appellants.

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Watt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Bledsoe v. SeamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Marvin v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Sharpe v. Federal Window & Office Cleaning Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API