Legal Opinion
Hooker v. Hooker
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 20, 1943PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
Roland Mather Hooker, to whom we shall hereafter refer as the defendant, and his then wife, who is now Winifred von Mohrenschildt, entered into a separation agreement. It recited that, as a result of unhappy differences between them, they had separated and were living apart, and provided that it should be lawful for each of them to continue so to live, each free from any interference by the other, as though they were unmarried; it stated that $15,000 had been paid to her which she agreed to accept in full satisfaction of his obligation to support her; and it also recited that the defendant…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Boardman v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Samson v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Hooker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.