Legal Opinion

South Carolina Insurance Reserve Fund v. East Richland County Public Service District

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 23, 2016No. Appellate Case No. 2014-000728; No. 5393PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McDonald, j.

East Richland County Public Service District (the District) appeals the circuit court’s order finding the South Carolina Insurance Reserve Fund (the Fund) owed no duty to defend or indemnify the District, arguing the circuit court erred in concluding (1) the policy exclusion relied upon by the Fund did not conflict with the provisions of the South Carolina Tort Claims Act, and (2) the Fund had no duty to defend or indemnify the District. We affirm.

FACTS

In 2010, Coley Brown filed a complaint against the District for inverse condemnation, trespass, and negligence. The complaint…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. City of Hartsville v. South Carolina Municipal Insurance & Risk Financing FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Helena Chemical Co. v. Allianz Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Joiner Ex Rel. Rivas v. RivasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Owners Insurance v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. S.C. Ins. Reserve Fund v. E. Richland Cnty. Pub. Serv. Dist. & Coley BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API