Rogge v. Rogge
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
Appellant Karen Lee Rogge seeks review of the trial court’s modification order and judgment granting sole legal and physical custody of the parties’ child to respondent Leonard John Rogge, Jr. Because the record does not reflect that the trial court considered certain critical “best interest” factors under Minn.Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1(a) (1992), we remand for additional findings.
FACTS
The parties’ seven-year marriage was dissolved in 1986, and appellant received sole legal and physical custody of the parties’ child B.L.R., born in February 1985. Appellant and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State on Behalf of Gunderson v. PreussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Marriage of Grein v. GreinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Dean v. PeltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Matter of the CIVIL COMMITMENT OF Gary George SPICERCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Custody of the Child of Williams v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In re the Matter of: Heather Ray Klammer v. Luke Stephen KlammerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Rogge v. RoggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993