Legal Opinion

State on Behalf of Gunderson v. Preuss

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1983No. C8-82-1479PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

Because the trial court’s findings in support of its decision to transfer custody of a child from the mother to the father do not comply with the requirements of Minn.Stat. § 518.18 (1982), we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Krystal Elizabeth Preuss was born on May 22, 1979, and on the following December 6, pursuant to a stipulation between the child’s mother, Sandra Gunderson, and defendant-respondent David Preuss, judgment was entered in the County Court for Anoka County determining David Preuss to be Krystal’s father and awarding custody of the child to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. D'Onofrio v. D'OnofrioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Marriage of Nice-Petersen v. Nice-PetersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Morey v. PeppinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Marriage of Rinker v. RinkerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Chapman v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Marriage of Heard v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Marriage of Grein v. GreinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API