Legal Opinion

Hurd v. Earl

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1841PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ERROR to the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

Assumpsit for work and labour. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and the statutory plea of payment and set-off alleging that the plaintiff had executed certain notes to one Fullender, who indorsed them to the defendant. The plaintiff filed three replications to the special plea: 1, That the plaintiff and defendant were in partnership, and purchased pork of Fullender for the use of the firm; that for a part of the pork so purchased, the notes mentioned in the plea were given; and that the defendant had procured them to be assigned to him by fraud; 2, The same, with an additional…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Talman v. GibsonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1828

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bates v. PricketIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API