Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Sheriff of Suffolk County

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 6, 1975PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTauro, C.J.

The plaintiffs, court officers appointed pursuant to G. L. c. 221, §§ 69,70, and 72, to attend sessions of the Superior and Supreme Judicial courts, filed a bill of complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that St. 1972, c. 740, § 10, amending c. 221, § 72, which reduces the mandatory retirement age for court officers from seventy to sixty-five, is unconstitutional if applied to them. Similar bills were filed on behalf of named plaintiffs in Norfolk and Middlesex counties2 and were consolidated for trial in Suffolk county, where, after consideration, the trial judge reported…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Blixt v. BlixtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Stetson v. Board of Selectmen of CarlisleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Leibovich v. AntonellisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API