Legal Opinion
Caesars Massachusetts Management Co. v. Crosby
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 13, 2015No. 14-1681PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOUTER, Associate Justice.
The plaintiff-appellant Caesars Entertainment Corporation and three Massachusetts affiliates (collectively, Caesars) were subject to an investigatory report by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission finding them unsuitable as proposed operators of a casino for which Sterling Suffolk Racecourse, LLC (SSR) sought a license. This action brought by Caesars under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 includes counts with (a) official capacity claims charging denial of Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment procedural and substantive due process and equal protection of the laws by the Commission’s…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Davis v. CoakleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- City of Revere v. Massachusetts Gaming CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Sterling Suffolk Racecourse v. Wynn Resorts, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- William Felkner v. Rhode Island CollegeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.