Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Reynolds

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 2010No. E047192PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

—Defendant, Steven Arthur Reynolds, a sexually violent predator (SVP) (Welf. & Inst. Code, 1 § 6600 et seq.), filed a petition for unconditional release (§ 6608), pro se, after he had been recommitted as an SVP, and while that recommitment was on appeal. The petition alleged only that (a) it has been nearly four years since his original commitment, and (b) prior to his recent recommitment proceeding, he was ready to go to trial with an expert available to testify on his behalf. Counsel was appointed. The People made a motion to dismiss the petition, and, at the hearing on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. FPI Development, Inc. v. NakashimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. YartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. GregersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. People v. LaBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. (HC) Naylor v. PriceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API