Legal Opinion

People v. Olsen

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 2014No. H039814PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant William Karl Olsen was committed for an indeterminate term to the State Department of Mental Health (now, State Department of State Hospitals; hereafter the Department) after a jury determined defendant to be a sexually violent predator within the meaning of the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA). (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.)

Defendant appealed from the judgment, contending that the indeterminate term of commitment violated equal protection, due process, and the ex post facto and double jeopardy clauses. This court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. LaBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. (HC) Naylor v. PriceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. LaBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. LaBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API