Legal Opinion
In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided August 23, 2001No. MDL 1087PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, Chief Judge.
This matter is now before the Court on various motions for summary judgment by Defendants. For the reasons set forth below, Cargill’s Motion for Summary Judgment [#630] is GRANTED; A.E. Staley’s (“Staley”) Motion for Summary Judgment [# 632] is GRANTED; American Maize’s Motion for Summary Judgment [# 650] is GRANTED; and Archer Daniels Midland’s (“ADM”) Motion for Summary Judgment [# 652] is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
I. The Parties
Plaintiffs are a consolidated class consisting of all U.S. purchasers of high fructose corn syrup (“HFCS”) who purchased this product directly from…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation. Appeal of a & W Bottling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Federal Trade Commission v. Arch Coal, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Kleen Products LLC v. International PaperDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- In re Text Messaging Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Dellwood Farms Inc v. Cargill IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002