Legal Opinion

In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 19, 2014No. 08 C 7082; MDL No. 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*792 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge:

Plaintiffs filed this suit on behalf of all those who purchased text-messaging services on a fee-per-text-message basis directly from four of the five defendants in this case: AT & T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon Wireless. Plaintiffs allege that these national wireless communications service providers, along with defendant CTIA-The Wireless Association, entered into and implemented a continuing contract, combination, and conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize prices for Text Messaging Services sold in the United…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Omnicare, Inc. v. Unitedhealth Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kleen Products LLC v. International PaperDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  2. In re Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., Cheese Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  3. DeSuno v. Accurate Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  4. LKQ Corporation v. General Motors CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  5. Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation (No. Ii)- Mdl No. 2925District Court, District of Columbia · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API